Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Haley Giavara vs Mary Lewis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Giavara vs Lewis analysis and find out who is favored!
Haley Giavara vs Mary Lewis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Giavara 1 - 0 Lewis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Giavara has won 43.69% of points on their second serve, while Lewis has won 36.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Giavara, in recent form, has won 51.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lewis has won 59.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.57% and 36.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Giavara has saved 53.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lewis has saved 62.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Giavara has won 50% of matches played (W/L 29/ 29), with Lewis winning 44.44% (W/L 8/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Giavara has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 59/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lewis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Giavara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.59% of matches (W/L 17/ 22), where as Lewis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 4/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Giavara winning 1 times and Lewis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Giavara winning 2 and Lewis winning 0. The last match between Giavara and Lewis was at the W60 Naples, 08-05-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Haley Giavara getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Giavara and Lewis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Giavara winning 0 times and Lewis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Giavara winning 0, and Lewis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Giavara has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.05 while Lewis has played against players with an average rank of 122.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Giavara has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lewis has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Giavara has converted 46.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lewis has converted 51.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
436
Rank
425
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
48% (82-90)
Career Total W/L
38% (29-47)
35% (7-13)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Haley Giavara vs Mary Lewis For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Giavara VS Lewis
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Haley Giavara | Mary Lewis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (35/48) | 47% (28/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 54% (15/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 29% (9/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (35/59) | 35% (17/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Haley Giavara
Player
Mary Lewis
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Haley Giavara | Mary Lewis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (7/13) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (17/28) | 55% (6/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (194/223) | 56% (51/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:23 | 1:21:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.9 | 191.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (873/1340) | 69% (209/303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (510/873) | 58% (122/209) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (203/467) | 36% (34/94) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (64/138) | 59% (19/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (545/1299) | 48% (111/231) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (7/20) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Haley Giavara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Haley Giavara
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriella Broadfoot
Player
Haley Giavara
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Aspen Schuman
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Anna Frey
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Vivian Yang
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
83
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Haley Giavara
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Haley Giavara
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
86 of
114)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Meng Yi Chen
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Haley Giavara
67%
(
84 of
126)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
48 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
121
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Haley Giavara
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mary Lewis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Failla
Player
Mary Lewis
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Lewis
Player
Lexington Reed
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mary Lewis
Player
Ana M Becerra
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mell Elizabeth Reasco Gonzalez
Player
Mary Lewis
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adithya Karunaratne
Player
Mary Lewis
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Lewis
Player
Selya Rakki
85%
(
88 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Annika Penickova
Player
Mary Lewis
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
9
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Lewis
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Giavara Vs Lewis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Giavara are available here and Lewis photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Haley Giavara
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
